/ qa & testing

End-to-end test automation

Playwright and Cypress for end-to-end, Vitest / Jest for unit and integration. Resilient selectors, parallel execution, screenshots and video for failed runs.

The right question is not "do we need test automation" — it is "which tests are worth automating". We write tests with the right balance (test pyramid: more unit, less e2e), use resilient selectors (data-testid, role-based) and structure them to survive refactors. The goal is not 100% coverage — it is one command before a PR that says "safe to merge" or "not".

What we deliver

  • Test pyramid — unit, integration and e2e in the right ratio
  • Resilient selectors (data-testid, role-based) that survive refactors
  • Parallel execution (Playwright shards) for fast CI runs
  • Screenshots and video for every failed run
  • Visual regression tests (Chromatic, Percy) where they earn their keep
  • Page Object Model or functional helpers — whichever fits the project
  • Documentation so your team can write new tests on their own

When to call us

  • PRs go through manual QA but slower than they should
  • Existing tests are flaky and nobody trusts them anymore
  • You need parallelization — tests take 30 minutes and block merges
  • You are preparing a refactor and want a safety net before starting

How we work

Audit of existing tests → framework selection (if not chosen) → pilot test suite for critical flows → CI integration → progressive expansion until you hit realistic coverage.

Tech stack

  • Playwright
  • Cypress
  • Vitest
  • Jest
  • Selenium
  • Chromatic
  • Percy

Frequently asked questions

For a new project — Playwright. Faster, multi-browser (including Safari), better debug API. Cypress when there is legacy investment or strong team expertise. Selenium only for legacy code or very specific requirements.

Got a complex software challenge?

We specialize in projects other agencies turn down. Send a brief — we reply within 24 hours.